Insurance Company Bias in ERISA Cases: Hartford’s History of Bias and Discovery of an Insurer’s Biased Claims Administration Process
September 26, 2018 McKennon Law Group PCThe Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), a 1974 federal law, sets minimum standards for many employee benefit plans and serves to provide protection for individuals in these plans. Discovery in ERISA cases is often limited because the statute’s primary …
When Guarding the Henhouse, Some Foxes Go Rogue: When an Insurer’s Conflict of Interest Factors into Administrating Group Long-Term Disability ERISA Plans
July 25, 2018 McKennon Law Group PCFew Americans can retire on their savings alone. Many workers participate in an employee benefits plans, which serve to provide financial security in case of disability or retirement. In the case of insurers that decide who qualifies for life, health …
Ninth Circuit Affirms MLG’s Six-Figure Judgment in a Disability Suit Filed Against Sun Life
April 29, 2015 Robert McKennonOn April 22, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision affirming the district court’s decision to award McKennon Law Group PC’s client, an attorney (“insured”), his past-due ERISA plan benefits, as well as …
Third-Party ERISA Administrator Abused Discretion by Denying Medical Coverage: A Tale of What Not to Do
September 16, 2014 Iris ChouSometimes an administrator so unashamedly abuses its discretion in handling an insurance claim that its actions constitute a textbook example of “what not to do” for other administrators and the ensuing decision provides a clear illustration of how courts apply …
McKennon Law Group Wins Disability Insurance Lawsuit Against Sun Life And Health Insurance Company Following Trial
December 11, 2012 Scott CalvertOn November 27, 2012, following a trial before Judge Cormac J. Carney of the United States Federal District Court for the Central District of California, Robert J. McKennon and Scott E. Calvert of the McKennon Law Group secured a victory …
Under ERISA, Communications with In-House Counsel Before a Final Claims Decision are Not Privileged and are Subject to Discovery to Show a Conflict of Interest
September 20, 2012 Scott CalvertAre insureds entitled to communications between an insurance company’s in-house counsel and the claims handlers that might otherwise be protected by the attorney-client privilege? Following a new ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, if the claimant is insured …
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under ERISA Not Required If Exhaustion Would Have Been Futile
April 27, 2011 Robert McKennonTerrance Burnett was eligible for short-term disability (“STD”) benefits and long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits through employee welfare benefit plans funded by his employer, The Raytheon Company, and administered by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”). After his doctors stated that Burnett’s …
District Court Applies Abuse of Discretion Standard of Review After Montour
January 14, 2010 Robert McKennonRecently, in Montour v. Harford Life & Accident, 582 F.3d 933 (9th Cir. 2009), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in one of its most important cases, adopted a new standard of reviewing ERISA abuse of discretion cases where …
"Top Hat" ERISA Plans Are Not Entitled To Special Treatment
January 14, 2010 Robert McKennonThe Ninth Circuit recently addressed, for the first time, whether the standard of review analysis for “top hat” ERISA plans is the same as for other ERISA plans. In Sznewajs v. U.S. Bancorp Amended and Restated Supplemental Benefits Plan, 572 F.3d …
Ninth Circuit Clarifies Application of Abuse of Discretion Review When Insurer Has a Conflict of Interest
January 14, 2010 Robert McKennonAfter the United States Supreme Court decided MetLife Ins. Co. v. Glenn in which the Court held that a reviewing court must consider the conflict of interest arising from the dual role of an insurer acting as a plan administrator …
